If Women, Like Sandra Fluke, Don’t Want To Be Called Sluts – Don’t Be Sluts

Maureen Dowd, Debbie Wasserman Shultz and Kirsten Powers are mad as hell at Rush Limbaugh and speaking out about his comments regarding Sandra Fluke.  (The links to their rebuttals of Limbaugh are attached to their names)  Each woman is either intentionally misrepresenting Sandra Fluke and her sole reason for testifying before congress, or they are too stupid to see that Sandra Fluke actually was advocating for free birth control and contraception to feed her, and her friends, nymphomania – not for any real health concerns or benefits.

Other than Shultz, who is bonifide stupid and a genuine idiot, Dowd and Powers are smart enough to know Fluke was acting on her own behalf, and the behalf of other young women who want to engage in sex, but don’t want to woman-up when the consequences of those actions arise afterwards.  Rush Limbaugh was merely pointing out the obvious, which everyone with a brain – tied behind their back or not – could clearly see was going on with Sandra’s testimony.  Limbaugh was also voicing his frustration with the Left, liberals, Barack Obama and the Democrat Party that for decades has been trying to force its immorality on America.

Barack Obama, by fiat, has forced a contraception mandate on all religious hospitals, institutions and insurance agencies which compels them to provide services to women, like birth control, contraception, abortifacients – including emergency drugs which kill an unborn baby after it has been created in the womb.  This unconstitutional mandate has been challenged by many religious institutions, the Catholic Church and conservatives all across America.  There was, and presumably still is, a push by congress to overturn that mandate.  Sandra Fluke’s purpose before congress was to provide testimony on behalf of, and support for, Obama’s contraception mandate.  In that testimony her only reason for supporting the mandate was because she could not afford to buy all the birth control and contraception she needed to keep up with her sex life.

Sandra herself, not Rush Limbaugh, invoked her own personal sex life and habits.  Sandra herself, not Rush Limbaugh, acknowledged she was a sex addict.  Sandra herself, not Rush Limbaugh, defined herself as a slut without calling herself a slut.  Rush Limbaugh merely stated the obvious and had some fun with it at the same time.

For Dowd and Powers to criticize Limbaugh for what he said about Sandra Fluke – which was neither slander or libelous; which contained more truth that hyperbole; which was as close to absolute fact as is allowed – is shockingly and prematurely immature and selfish on their parts.

Says Dowd:

He’s [Limbaugh] brutalizing a poised, wholesome-looking 30-year-old Georgetown law student as a “slut,” “a prostitute” and “round-heeled” simply for testifying to lawmakers about wanting the school to amend its health insurance to cover contraception.”

Fluke may be “poised”, she may be “wholesome looking” but her “aim” in wanting “to amend her school’s insurance to cover contraception” was to satisfy and slake her own sexual lust.  Why is Dowd avoiding the obvious in Fluke’s testimony?  Why does Dowd reject Flukes own testimony and her own intentions in wanting to access birth control and contraception?  Why does Dowd not demand Fluke apologize to congress, to Rush Limbaugh, to all of America for her arrogance, her condescension and her childish behavior, and for wasting everyone’s time, and probably some amount of tax dollars?

Says Powers”

“Let it be shouted from the rooftops that Rush Limbaugh should not have called Ms. Fluke a slut or, as he added later, a “prostitute” who should post her sex tapes. It’s unlikely that his apology will assuage the people on a warpath for his scalp, and after all, why should it? He spent days attacking a woman as a slut and prostitute and refused to relent. Now because he doesn’t want to lose advertisers, he apologizes. What’s in order is something more like groveling—and of course a phone call to Ms. Fluke—if you ask me”

Powers also says there is a war on women in America.  And she is right.  It has been a war waged by liberal feminists for decades to brainwash all women into believing the only true way to freedom and equality in America is through sex; that “control” over one’s body means to right to kill an unborn, unplanned child created through sex without consequences, without recrimination, without government interference – but with plenty of government tax dollars.

Powers is incensed Limbaugh would call Fluke a slut for demanding free contraception to carry on a lifestyle that for thousands of years has been defined by societies all over the world as slutty, and the women who engaged in the activity as sluts.  We can argue about what we call men who engage in the same activity, and there is no reason not to call men sluts, or some masculine counterpart, who do.  But we cannot disregard the fact that Sandra Fluke, in her own bloody testimony is advocating for free contraception to carry on her own slutty, sexual activities – and she wants us, the taxpayers to pay for it.

There is also a war on men in America, by women like Dowd, Powers, and even Shultz, who, like Sandra Fluke, is prone to showing what an airheard, twit and ditz she is every time she opens her mouth and says anything.  If women don’t want to be called sluts, if women don’t want men to call women sluts – don’t be sluts, and don’t engage in sexual activities that are known for being slutty.  And if women want men to treat them equally, fairly and respectfully – first of all, stop throwing yourselves at them.  Secondly, take “control” of your body not by exploiting it but by preserving it for the man you will marry.  Thirdly, “empower” yourselves by asserting your intelligence not flaunting your feminine “assets”.  Women have a brain.  Don’t misuse it like Debbie Wasserman Shultz, like Sandra Fluke, like all liberal feminists do.

Sandra Fluke, in her testimony, used her sex, and sex itself, as her basis for supporting Obama’s contraception mandate.  Where in Sandra Fluke’s testimony did she ever once use her brain?

Related articles

• Sandra Fluke: Name Calling Won’t Silence Us (newser.com)
• Rush Limbaugh ‘slut’ row no ‘Fluke’ (malburns.wordpress.com)
• Vetting Sandra Fluke Not a Fluke. (longversion.wordpress.com)
• If Women, Like Sandra Fluke, Don’t Want To Be Called Sluts – Don’t Be Sluts (neosecularist.com)

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.